The flexibility and autonomy in the study plans of Bachelor's Degree programs in Basic Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25757/invep.v15i1.425Keywords:
Degree in Basic Education, Initial teacher training, Curricular Flexibility, AutonomyAbstract
Curricular flexibility and student autonomy in higher education are fundamental principles for ensuring quality at this level of education and for the training of future teachers. This study investigated curricular flexibility and autonomy in the study plans of 25 Bachelor's degrees in Basic Education (BE) in Portugal. The comparative document analysis examined the nature and duration of the curricular units (CU) as well as the distribution of the workload between contact hours and autonomous work. The results showed that, although all BE programs include elective CU, which can be chosen by students, these account for less than 5% of the total credits in most institutions, thereby limiting student choice. The total workload in the degrees ranges from 4500 to 5040 hours, with significant differences in the proportion of contact hours and autonomous work between institutions and training components. The inclusion of year-long CU and the high number of contact hours were identified as barriers to student mobility and autonomy, reducing students' opportunities for choice. It is concluded that curricular flexibility and the promotion of autonomy are underexplored, highlighting the need for adjustments to align study plans with student-centered best practices, as advocated by the Bologna Process.
Downloads
References
Alves, J. M. (2017). Autonomia e Flexibilidade: pensar e organizar outros modos de gestão curricular e organizacional. In C. Palmeirão & J. M. Alves (Eds.), Construir a autonomia e a flexibilização curricular. Os desafios das escolas e dos professores (pp. 6-14). Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
Bardin, L. (2008). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
Barroso, J. (2001). O século da escola: do mito da reforma á reforma de um mito. In T. Ambrósio, E. Terrén, D. Hameline & J. Barroso (Eds.), O século da escola, entre a utopia e a burocracia (pp. 63-94). Edições ASA.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy. Routledge.
Birtwistle, T., Brown, C., & Wagenaar, R. (2016). A long way to go … A study on the implementation of the learning-outcomes based approach in the EU. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, Bilbao, 3(2), 429–463.
Brito, E. (2015). (Re)pensar a formação de professores no contexto do Processo de Bolonha: que constrangimentos? Que alternativas? In M. C. Gregório & S. Ferreira (Eds), Formação Inicial de Professores (pp. 249-271). Conselho Nacional de Educação.
Bokdam, J., & van den Ende, I. (2014). Ensinar professores: Formação de Professores do Ensino Básico na Europa - situação e Perspetivas. European Comission, Disponível em http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies
Choi-Lundberg,D., Al-Aubaidy, H., Burgess, J., Clifford, C., Cuellar, W., Errey, J., Harper, A., Malley, R., Ross, R., Williams, A., & Hays, R. (2020). Minimal effects of reduced teaching hours on undergraduate medical student learning outcomes and course evaluations. Medical Teacher, 42(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1652258.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible Learning in a Digital World. Open Learning, 17(3), 217-230.
Costa, J., Franz, S., & Menge, C. (2023). Stays abroad of pre-service teachers and their relation to teachers' beliefs about cultural diversity in classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 129, 1-11.
Decreto-Lei n.º 42/2005, de 22 de fevereiro. Aprova os princípios reguladores de instrumentos para a criação do espaço europeu de ensino superior. Diário da República: série I-A, Lisboa, n. 37, p. 1494 – 1499, 2005. Disponível em: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/42-2005-606304
Decreto-Lei n.º 43/2007, de 22 de fevereiro. Aprova o regime jurídico da habilitação profissional para a docência na educação pré-escolar e nos ensinos básico e secundário. Diário da República: série I, Lisboa, n. 38, p. 1320 – 1328, 2007. Disponível em: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/43-2007-517819
Decreto-Lei n.º 79/2014, de 14 de maio. Aprova o regime jurídico da habilitação profissional para a docência na educação pré-escolar e nos ensinos básico e secundário. Diário da República: série I, Lisboa, n. 92, p. 2819 – 2818, 2005. Disponível em: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/legislacao-consolidada/decreto-lei/2014-73250886
Decreto-Lei n.º 112/2023, de 29 de novembro. Altera o regime jurídico da habilitação profissional para a docência na educação pré-escolar e nos ensinos básico e secundário. Diário da República: série I, Lisboa, n. 231, p. 4 – 14. Disponível em: https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/112-2023-224870952
European Commission (2007). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament: Improving the Quality of Teacher Education Improving the Quality of Teacher Education.
European Parliament (2008). Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Improving the quality of teachers education. EESC.
European Commission /EACEA/EURYDICE (2020). The European Higher Education Area in 2020: Bologna Process Implementation Report. EACEA.
European Students' Union (ESU) (2015). Overview on Student-Centred Learning in Higher Education in Europe: Research Study. ESU.
European Students' Union (ESU) (2020). Bologna with student eyes 2020. ESU.
Flores, M. A. (2015). Formação de professores: questões críticas e desafios a considerar. In M. Gregório & S. Ferreria (Eds.), Formação Inicial de Professores (pp. 192-222). Conselho Nacional de Educação.
Gijselaers, W., & Schmidt, H. (1995). Effects of Quantity of Instruction on Time Spent on Learning and Achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 183–201.
Hedges, M., Pacheco, G., & Webber, D. (2014). What determines students’ choices of elective modules? International Review of Economics Education, 17, 39–54.
Kember, D. (2006). Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students’ perceptions of their workload. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 165–184.
Kember, D., NG, S., TSE, H., Wong, E., & Pomfret, M. (1996). An examination of the interrelationships between workload, study time, learning approaches and academic outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079612331381261
Klemenčič, M. (2017). From Student Engagement to Student Agency: Conceptual Considerations of European Policies on Student-Centered Learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Policy, 30(1), 69–85.
Klemenčič, M., & Hoidn, S. (2020). Conclusion : Beyond student-centered classrooms – a comprehensive approach to student-centered learning and teaching through a student-centered ecosystems framework. In S. Hoidn & M. Klemenčič (Eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 626-644). Routledge.
Kusurkar, R., & Croiset, G. (2014). Electives support autonomy and autonomous motivation in undergraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 36(10), 915–916.
Leathwood, C., & O’connell, P. (2003). “It’s a struggle”: The construction of the “new student” in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 597-615.
Lucu, R. (2010).Ten Years after Bologna: towards a european teacher education area. In O. Gassner, L. Kerger & M. Schartz (Eds), The ten first Years after Bologna (pp. 53-96). Editura universitatii din Bucuresti.
Movchan, L., & Zarishniak, I. (2017). The Role of Elective Courses in Students′ Professional Development: Foreign Experience. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 7(2), 20–26.
Netz, N. (2015). What deters students from studying abroad? Evidence from four European countries and its implications for higher education policy. Higher Education Policy, 28, 151-174.
Roldão, M. C. (2011). Um currículo de currículos. Edições Cosmos.
Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Routledge.
Sin, C. (2017). Comparative analysis of Physics master degree curricula across national and institutional settings: manifestations of student-centred learning and implications for degree comparability. Curriculum Journal, 28(3).
Sin, C., Tavares, O., & Neave, G. (2017). Student Mobility in Portugal: Grappling With Adversity. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(22), 120–135.
Slavin, S., Schindler, D., & Chibnall, J. (2014). Medical Student Mental Health 3.0: Improving Student Wellness Through Curricular Changes. Academic Medicine, 89(4), 573-577.
Šušnjar, A., & Hovhannisyan, G. (2020). Bridging the Policy-Practice Gap: Student-centered learning from the students’ perspective. In S. Hoidn & M. Klemenčič (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Student-Centered Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 543-561). Routledge.
Torenbeek, M., Jansen, E., & Suhre, C. (2013). Predicting undergraduates’ academic achievement: the role of the curriculum, time investment and self-regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1393–1406.
Valente, B., Feio, M., & Leite, T. (2023). Os cursos de Licenciatura em Educação Básica em Portugal: uma análise comparativa. Educação e Pesquisa, 49, e261454. 1-19.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bianor Valente, Mariana Feio, Teresa Leite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published or submitted to Da Investigação às Práticas are licensed according to Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors agree that:
Copyrights of all articles published are retained by authors with first publication copyright granted to the journal.
All articles are under the Creative Commons Attribution License recognizing the authorship of the publication and identifying that first publication took place in this journal.
Authors have the right to free distribute or make available in private or institutional pages the version published by Da Investigação às Práticas: Estudos de Natureza Educacional provided the original proper citation.
The journal only accepts articles not published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. After published, the article cannot be published again partial or totally without the editorial board consent.