Processos disfuncionais no trabalho de grupo e perceções de justiça dos estudantes: um estudo de caso exploratório no ensino superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25757/invep.v11i1.235Resumo
Os contributos desiguais e outras características disfuncionais dos grupos de estudantes são um fenómeno relativamente bem investigado. No entanto, ainda sabemos pouco sobre como os alunos vivenciam estas situações e como isso afeta a sua perceção da justiça dos sistemas que os docentes usam para avaliar o seu trabalho. Neste artigo, apresenta-se e discute-se os resultados de um estudo de caso que abordou estas questões. A investigação concentrou-se numa turma de métodos de pesquisa sociológica, no ensino superior, em que os alunos formaram grupos de trabalho para desenvolverem projetos de pesquisa ao longo de um semestre. Os dados foram recolhidos por meio de entrevistas qualitativas semiestruturadas e sujeitos a uma análise de conteúdo. Os resultados indicam que embora a maioria dos estudantes tenha experienciado situações disfuncionais nos seus grupos, especialmente no que diz respeito a contributos desiguais dos respetivos membros, rejeitou, mesmo assim, a adoção de um sistema de avaliação baseado no princípio da equidade, através da prestação de contas individual. Interpretamos estes resultados à luz das normas relacionais que governam a vida social dos grupos de estudantes.SoSDownloads
Referências
Aarnio, M., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., Nieminen, J., & Pyoralla (2014). How do tutors intervene when conflicts on knowledge arise in tutorial groups? Advances in Health Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9473-5
Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255-264. doi: 10.1177/0273475308322283
Ain, C. T., Sabir, F., & Willison, J. (2018). Research skills that men and women developed at university and then used in workplaces. Studies in Higher Education, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1496412
Ainsworth, J. (2016). Student-led project teams: significance of regulation strategies in high- and low-performing teams. Journal of Management Education, 40(4), 453-477. doi: 10.1177/1052562916630575
Albon, R., & Jewels, T. (2014). Mutual performance monitoring: elaborating the development of a team learning theory. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, 149-164. doi: 10.1007/s10726-012-9311-9
Askay, D. (2017). Communication. In D. Levi (Ed.), Group dynamics for teams (pp. 105-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bacon, D. R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 248-267. doi: 10.1177/1052562904263729
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Silver, W. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467-488. doi: 10.1177/105256299902300503
Bartholomay, D. J. (2018). Making room for methods: Incorporating full-scale research projects in non-methods courses. Teaching Sociology 46(3), 247-261. doi: 107.171/0707/90200925055X5X171773377356
Borg, M., Kembro, J., Notander, J. P., Petersson, C., & Ohlsson, L. (2011). Conflict management in student groups: A teacher’s perspective in higher education. Högre utbildning, 1(2), 111-124.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychological research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brennan, P., & Silman, A. (1992). Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. British Medical Journal, 304, 1491-1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491
Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 268-272. doi: 10.1080/08832320309598613
Broughton, C. (2011). Making the undergraduate classroom into a policy think tank: reflections from a field methods class. Teaching Sociology, 39(1), 73-87. doi: 10.1177/0092055X10390650
Caulfield, S. L., & Persell, C. H. (2006). Teaching social science reasoning and quantitative literacy: The role of collaborative groups. Teaching Sociology, 34(1), 39-53. doi: 10.1177/0092055X0603400104
Chapman, K. J., & van Auken, S. (2001). Creating positive group project experiences: An examination of the role of the instructor on students’ perceptions of group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 117-127. doi: 10.1177/0273475301232005
Clark, T., & Foster, L. (2017). ‘I’m not a natural mathematician’: Inquiry-based learning, constructive alignment and introductory quantitative social science. Teaching Public Administration, 35(3), 260–279. doi: 10.1177/0144739417711219
Clarke, S., & Blissenden, M. (2013). Assessing student group work: Is there a right way to do it? The Law Teacher, 47(3), 368-381. doi: 10.1080/03069400.2013.85
Colquitt, J. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2006). Justice in teams: The context sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 868-899. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00047.x
Curseu, P. (2011). Intra-group conflict and teamwork quality: The moderating role of leadership styles. Administrative Sciences, 1, 3-13. doi:10.3390/admsci1010003
Curşeu, P., Janssen, S., & Raab, J. (2012). Connecting the dots: Social network structure, conflict, and group cognitive complexity. Higher Education, 63, 621-629. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9462-7
Curşeu, Petru, Steffie E. A. Janssen, and Jorg Raab. 2012. “Connecting the dots: Social network structure, conflict, and group cognitive complexity.” Higher Education 63:621-629. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9462-7
Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary cross¬ings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 7-55.
Davison, H. K., Mishra, V., Bing, M. N., & Frink, D. W. (2014). How individual performance affects variability of peer evaluations in classroom teams: A distributive justice perspective. Journal of Management Education, 38(1), 43–85. DOI: 10.1177/105256291247528
Deeter-Schmelz, D. R., Kennedy, K. N., & Ramsey, R. P. (2002). Enriching our understanding of student team effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 114-124. doi: 10.1177/027753024002004
Dixon, A. L., Gassenheimer, J. B., & Barr, T. F. (2003). Identifying the lone wolf: A team perspective. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 23, 205-219. doi: 10.1080/08853134.2003.10748999
Dommeyer, C. J. (2007). Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 175-188. doi:10.1177/0273475307302019
Earley, M. A. (2014). A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 242-253. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
Eglitis, D. S., Buntman, F. L., & Alexander, D. V. (2016). Social issues and problem-based learning in Sociology: Opportunities and challenges in the undergraduate classroom. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 212–20. doi: 10.1177/0092055X16643572
Espey, M. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking using team-based learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 15-29. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344196
Fiechtner, S. B., & Davis, E. A. (2016). Republication of “Why some groups fail: A survey of students’ experiences with learning groups”. Journal of Management Education, 40(1), 12-29. doi: 10.1177/1052562915619639
Huggins, C. M., & Stamatel, J. P. (2015). An exploratory study comparing the effectiveness of lecturing versus team-based learning. Teaching Sociology, 43(3), 227-235. doi: 10.1177/0092055X15581929
Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., & Malshe, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 42-54. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012178
Joo, M. H., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Measuring university students’ group work contribution: Scale development and validation. Small Group Research, 48(3) 288–310. doi: 10.1177/1046496416685159
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
Kidder, D. L., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (2012). Examining the influence of team project design decisions on student perceptions and evaluations of instructors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 69-81. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0040
Kouliavtsev, M. (2012). Social loafers, free-riders, or diligent isolates: Self-perceptions in teamwork. Atlantic Economic Journal, 40(4), 437–438. doi: 10.1007/s11293-012-9333-3
Lane, D. R. (2012). Peer feedback processes and individual accountability in team-based learning. In M. Sweet & L. K. Michaelsen (eds.), Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities (pp. 51-62). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Lima, J. Á. (2013). Por uma análise de conteúdo mais fiável. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 47(1), 7-29. https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/rppedagogia/article/view/1647-8614_47-1_1/1143
Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., & Moore, D. D. (2007). Development of a theory-based assessment of team member effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 505-524. doi: 10.1177/0013164406292085
Maiden, B., & Perry, B. (2011). Dealing with free-riders in assessed group work: Results from a study at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 451-464. doi: 10.1080/02602930903429302
Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students’ experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(2), 138-150. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1122585
McCorkle, D. E., Reardon, J., Alexander, J. F., Kling, N. D., Harris, R. C., & Iyer, R. V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106-117. doi: 10.1177/0273475399212004
Mello, J. A. (1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings. Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 253-259. doi: 10.1177/105256299301700210
Mero, N. P., Guidice, R. M., & Brownlee, A. L. (2007). Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 223-252. doi: 10.1177/0149206306297633
Monson, R. (2017). Groups that work: Student achievement in group research projects and effects on individual learning. Teaching Sociology, 45(3), 240-251. doi: 10.1177/0092055X17697772
Monson, R. A. (2018). Do they have to like it to learn from it? Students’ experiences, group dynamics, and learning outcomes in group research projects. Teaching Sociology, 1-19. doi: 10.1177/0092055X18812549
Neu, W. A. (2012). Unintended cognitive, affective, and behavioral consequences of group assignments. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(1) 67–81. doi: 10.1177/0273475311430806
North, A. C., Linley, P. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (2000). Social loafing in a cooperative classroom task. Educational Psychology, 20, 389-392. Doi: 10.1080/01443410020016635
Park, J. J., Park, S., Choe, N. H., & Schallert, D. L. (2019). When groups experience conflict: Intersection among undergraduates’ individual and group motivational goals project commitment and emotions. Educational Psychology, DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1618444
Peyrefitte, M., & Lazar, G. (2018). Student-centered pedagogy and real-world research: Using documents as sources of data in teaching social science skills and methods. Teaching Sociology, 46(1), 62-74. doi: 10.1177/0092055X17727835
Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 37-45. doi: 10.1177/0273475302250571
Postlethwait, A. E. (2016). Group projects in social work education: The influence of group characteristics and moderators on undergraduate student outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 36, 256-274. doi: 10.1080/08841233.2016.1182610
Riebe, L., Girardi, A., & Whitsed, C. (2016). A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education. Small Group Research, 47(6), 619-664. doi: 10.1177/1046496416665221
Rusticus, S. A., & Justus, B. J. (2019). Comparing student- and teacher-formed teams on group dynamics, satisfaction, and performance. Small Group Research, 50(4) 443–457. DOI: 10.1177/1046496419854520
Scott-Ladd, B., & Chan, C. C. A. (2008). Using action research to teach students to manage team learning and improve teamwork satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 231-248. doi: 10.1177/1469787408095848
Stangor, C. (2004). Social groups in action and interaction. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Stein, R. E., Colyer, C. J., & Manning, J. (2016). Student accountability in team-based learning classes. Teaching Sociology, 44(1) 28–38. DOI: 10.1177/0092055X15603429
Sweet, M., & Pelton-Sweet, L. M. (2008). The social foundation of team-based learning: Students accountable to students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 116, 29-40. doi: 10.1002/tl.331
Wagner, J., III. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-172. DOI: 10.2307/256731
Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Da Investigação às Práticas: Estudos de Natureza Educacional
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os artigos da revista Da Investigação às Práticas: Estudos de Natureza Educacional estão licenciados conforme Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 4.0) Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação. Os artigos estão simultaneamente licenciados sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a partilha do trabalho com reconhecimento da sua autoria e da publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os autores têm autorização para disponibilizar a versão do texto publicada na Da Investigação às Práticas: Estudos de Natureza Educacional sem custos em repositórios institucionais ou outras plataformas de distribuição de trabalhos académicos (p.ex. ResearchGate), com a devida citação ao trabalho original.
A revista não aceita artigos que estejam publicado (exceto sob a forma de resumo ou como parte de uma tese), submetidos ou sejam submetidos durante o processo editorial a outras revistas ou publicações. Após publicado o artigo não pode ser submetido a outra revista ou publicação parcial ou totalmente sem autorização da coordenação editorial da Investigação às Práticas: Estudos de Natureza Educacional.
e-ISSN: 2182-1372